901:2-1-04 Modifications.

 

 

 

Rule Summary and Fiscal Analysis (Part A)

 

Agriculture

Agency Name

 

Meat Inspection                                                   Peter Esselburne

Division                                                                  Contact

 

8995 E. Main St. Reynoldsburg OH 43068 - 3399	614-466-2732	614-466-6124
Agency Mailing Address (Plus Zip)	Phone	Fax

 

 

901:2-1-04

Rule Number

AMENDMENT

TYPE of rule filing

Rule Title/Tag Line              Modifications.

RULE SUMMARY

1.  Is the rule being filed consistent with the requirements of the RC 119.032 review? Yes

2.  Are you proposing this rule as a result of recent legislation? No

3.  Statute prescribing the procedure in accordance with the agency is required to adopt the rule: 119.03

4.  Statute(s) authorizing agency to adopt the rule: RC 918.04

5.  Statute(s) the rule, as filed, amplifies or implements: RC 918.10

6.  State the reason(s) for proposing (i.e., why are you filing,) this rule:

Title 9 CFR has been adopted pursuant to the Federal meat inspection act (34 Stat. 1260) as amended by the Wholesome Meat Act (81 Stat. 584, 21 U.S.C. Supp., Section 601 et seq.). In working with the adopted Title 9 CFR 301 to 417(January 1, 1999) in the context of Ohio's meat inspection activity, ODA has determined that there is a need for modifying this portion of the adopted CFR text in order to add the Title 9 CFR 416.1 - 416.7 Sanitation Performance Standards, adopted on January 25, 2000 by USDA into the current Ohio regulatory atuhority.

7.  If the rule is an AMENDMENT, then summarize the changes and the content of the proposed rule; If the rule type is RESCISSION, NEW or NO CHANGE,

then summarize the content of the rule:

The proposed rule will add the Sanitation Performance Standards language to the current adopted Title 9 CFR language.

8.  If the rule incorporates a text or other material by reference and the agency claims the incorporation by reference is exempt from compliance with sections

121.71 to 121.74 of the Revised Code because the text or other material is generally available to persons who reasonably can be expected to be affected by the rule, provide an explanation of how the text or other material is generally available to those persons:

Title 9 is generally available to any affected person through the Internet or any Meat Inspector's computer.

9.  If the rule incorporates a text or other material by reference, and it was infeasible for the agency to file the text or other material electronically, provide an explanation of why filing the text or other material electronically was infeasible:

Not Applicable.

10.  If the rule is being rescinded and incorporates a text or other material by reference, and it was infeasible for the agency to file the text or other material, provide an explanation of why filing the text or other material was infeasible:

Not Applicable.

11.  If revising or refiling this rule, identify changes made from the previously filed version of this rule; if none, please state so:

Corrected RSFA with reference to adopted materials.

12. 119.032 Rule Review Date: 11/27/2002

(If you answered NO to question No. 1, provide the scheduled review date. If you answered YES to No. 1, the review date for this rule is the filing date.)

NOTE: At time of final filing, two dates are required: the current review date plus a date not to exceed 5 years from the effective date for Amended rules or a date not to exceed 5 years from the review date for No Change rules.

FISCAL ANALYSIS

13.  Estimate the total amount by which this proposed rule would increase / decrease either revenues / expenditures for the agency during the current biennium (in dollars): Explain the net impact of the proposed changes to the budget of your agency/department.

This will have no impact on revenues or expenditures. NA

Not applicable.

14.  Identify the appropriation (by line item etc.) that authorizes each expenditure necessitated by the proposed rule:

No appropriation/expenditure/authorization needed.

15.  Provide a summary of the estimated cost of compliance with the rule to all directly affected persons. When appropriate, please include the source for your information/estimated costs, e.g. industry, CFR, internal/agency:

Those persons directly affected by this proposed rule should not have any additional costs of compliance. There are no mandated compliance terms in the new rule since it just completes the replacement sanitation rule package that replaced the old deleted Title 9 CFR Part 308.

16.  Does this rule have a fiscal effect on school districts, counties, townships, or municipal corporations? No

17.  Does this rule deal with environmental protection or contain a component dealing with environmental protection as defined in R. C. 121.39? No