901:10-3-02 Effluent limitations definitions and applicability.  

  • Text Box: ACTION: Refiled Text Box: DATE: 11/25/2008 2:19 PM

     

     

     

    Rule Summary and Fiscal Analysis (Part A)

     

    Department of Agriculture

    Agency Name

     

    Livestock Environmental Permitting                Marsha Perge

    Division                                                                  Contact

     

    8995 East Main Street Reynoldsburg OH 43068-3399

    614-728-6390        614-466-6124

    Agency Mailing Address (Plus Zip)                                       Phone                     Fax

    901:10-3-02

    Rule Number

    AMENDMENT

    TYPE of rule filing

    Rule Title/Tag Line              Effluent limitations definitions and applicability.

    RULE SUMMARY

    1.  Is the rule being filed consistent with the requirements of the RC 119.032 review? Yes

    2.  Are you proposing this rule as a result of recent legislation? No

    3.  Statute prescribing the procedure in accordance with the agency is required to adopt the rule: 119.03

    4.  Statute(s) authorizing agency to adopt the rule: 903.08, 903.10

    5.  Statute(s) the rule, as filed, amplifies or implements: 903.01, 903.08, 903.09, 903.10

    6.  State the reason(s) for proposing (i.e., why are you filing,) this rule:

    To correct minor typographical error in previous filing.

    7.  If the rule is an AMENDMENT, then summarize the changes and the content of the proposed rule; If the rule type is RESCISSION, NEW or NO CHANGE, then summarize the content of the rule:

    Change the word mean to a plural tense.

    Page 2                                                                                      Rule Number: 901:10-3-02

    8.  If the rule incorporates a text or other material by reference and the agency claims the incorporation by reference is exempt from compliance with sections

    121.71 to 121.74 of the Revised Code because the text or other material is generally available to persons who reasonably can be expected to be affected by the rule, provide an explanation of how the text or other material is generally available to those persons:

    This rule references chapter 40 of the federal code of regulations, chapter 903 of the Ohio Revised Code, as well as multiple rules established by the department. All references are available free via website at www.usda.gov or www.ohioagriculture.gov. A hard copy is also available for a fee to any person who submits a request to the appropriate governing body.

    9.  If the rule incorporates a text or other material by reference, and it was infeasible for the agency to file the text or other material electronically, provide an explanation of why filing the text or other material electronically was infeasible:

    As the rules referenced are being filed in a package in conjunction with this rule package and as they are readily available to affected persons, it would be infeasible to file then as electronic attachments to this rule.

    10.  If the rule is being rescinded and incorporates a text or other material by reference, and it was infeasible for the agency to file the text or other material, provide an explanation of why filing the text or other material was infeasible:

    Not Applicable.

    11.  If revising or refiling this rule, identify changes made from the previously filed version of this rule; if none, please state so:

    To clarify effective date of federal reference.

    12. 119.032 Rule Review Date: 10/6/2008

    (If the rule is not exempt and you answered NO to question No. 1, provide the scheduled review date. If you answered YES to No. 1, the review date for this rule is the filing date.)

    NOTE: If the rule is not exempt at the time of final filing, two dates are required: the current review date plus a date not to exceed 5 years from the effective date for Amended rules or a date not to exceed 5 years from the review date for No Change rules.

    Page 3                                                                                      Rule Number: 901:10-3-02

    FISCAL ANALYSIS

    13.  Estimate the total amount by which this proposed rule would increase / decrease either revenues / expenditures for the agency during the current biennium (in dollars): Explain the net impact of the proposed changes to the budget of your agency/department.

    This will have no impact on revenues or expenditures. 0.00

    No impact on the agency.

    14.  Identify the appropriation (by line item etc.) that authorizes each expenditure necessitated by the proposed rule:

    No expenditures necessitated in this rule.

    15.  Provide a summary of the estimated cost of compliance with the rule to all directly affected persons. When appropriate, please include the source for your information/estimated costs, e.g. industry, CFR, internal/agency:

    No new cost to affected persons. Cost to affected persons will be minimal if in compliance with the rule.

    16.  Does this rule have a fiscal effect on school districts, counties, townships, or municipal corporations? No

    17.  Does this rule deal with environmental protection or contain a component dealing with environmental protection as defined in R. C. 121.39? Yes

    You must complete the Environmental rule Adoption/Amendment Form in order to comply with Am. Sub. 106 of the 121st General Assembly.

    Text Box: ACTION: Refiled                                                                                                                                              Text Box: DATE: 11/25/2008 2:19 PM

    Page 1                                                                                                                                                                                   ERAF 6/00

    Environmental Rule Adoption/Amendment Form          

    Pursuant to Am. Sub. H.B. 106 of the 121st General Assembly, prior to adopting a rule or an amendment to a rule dealing with environmental protection, or containing a component dealing with environmental protection, a state agency shall:

    (1)      Consult with organizations that represent political subdivisions, environmental interests, business interests, and other persons affected by the proposed rule or amendment.

    (2)     Consider documentation relevant to the need for, the environmental benefits or consequences of, other benefits of, and the technological feasibility of the proposed rule or rule amendment.

    (3)      Specifically identify whether the proposed rule or rule amendment is being adopted or amended to enable the state to obtain or maintain approval to administer and enforce a federal environmental law or to participate in a federal environmental program, whether the proposed rule or rule amendment is more stringent than its federal counterpart, and, if the proposed rule or rule amendment is more stringent, the rationale for not incorporating its federal counterpart.

    (4)      Include with the proposed rule or rule amendment and rule summary and fiscal analysis required to be filed with the Joint Committee on Agency Rule Review information relevant to the previously listed requirements.

    (A)            Were organizations that represent political subdivisions, environmental interests, business interests, and other persons affected by the proposed rule or amendment consulted?

    X

                                                 

    Yes                    No

    If YES, please list each contact. Please see attached list number 1

    If NO, please explain why affected organizations were not contacted.

    (B)            Was documentation that is relevant to the need for, the environmental benefits or consequences of, other benefits of, and the technological feasibility of the proposed rule or amendment considered?

    X

                                                 

    Yes                    No

    Rule #                                         

    If YES, please list the information provided and attach a copy of each piece of documentation to this

    Page 2                                                                                                                                                                                   ERAF 6/00

    form     (A    SUMMARY   OR    INDEX     MAY   BE   ATTACHED   IN   LIEU   OF    THE   ACTUAL DOCUMENTATION).

    See attachment list 2

    If NO, please indicate the reasons for not providing the information.

    (C)            Is the proposed rule or rule amendment being adopted or amended to enable the state to obtain or maintain approval to administer and enforce a federal environmental law or to participate in a federal environmental program?

    X

                                                 

    Yes                    No

    If YES, is the proposed rule or rule amendment more stringent than its federal counterpart? X

    Yes                    No

    If YES, what is the rationale for not incorporating the federal counterpart? The federal counterpart has been incorporated into the rule.

    (D)           If this is a rule amendment that is being adopted under a state statute that establishes standards with which the amendment is to comply, is the proposed rule amendment more stringent than the rule that it is proposing to amend?

    X

                                                 

    Yes                    No

    If YES, please explain why?

    To comply with the federal regulations for NPDES delegation.

    Text Box: ACTION: Refiled                                                                                                           Text Box: DATE: 11/25/2008 2:19 PM

    Environmental Rule Adoption/Amendment Form Attachment 1

    Contact List:

    Doug Alderman, Ohio Water Environment Association, ODA CAFF Committee Cathy Alexander, Ohio EPA, ODA CAFF Committee

    Carl Ayers, Ohio Dairy Farmers Patrick Bailey, ODA

    Ron Baldrich, Ottowa Vet Clinic

    Tim Barnes, Ohio Sheep Improvement Association, ODA CAFF Committee Richard Bodenbender, Citizens of Putnam County

    Robert J. Boggs, ODA Gary Bowman, OSU

    Gerald Boynton, Public Representative, ODA CAFF Committee Scott Briggs, Tuscarawas SWCD

    Dr. Beverly Byrum, ODA

    James Carey, Concerned Citizens Jim Chakeres, Ohio Poultry Assn.

    Don Clark, Ohio Dept. of Development Michael Cochran, Ohio Township Assn.

    Collin Coy, Water Management Association of Ohio, ODA CAFF Committee Matt Davis, Ohio Pork Producers

    Chuck Divelbiss, Public Representative, ODA CAFF Committee

    Trent Dougherty, Rep. of Statewide Environmental Advocacy, ODA CAFF Committee Dr. Maurice Eastridge, OSU, ODA CAFF Committee

    Kristina Erlewine, ODA Michael Eggert, OEPA Kevin Elder, ODA

    Andy Ety, ODA

    Norman Fausey, USDA-ARS

    Glen Feichtner, Ohio Cattlemen's Association, ODA CAFF Committee Kit Fogle, Ohio Farmers Union

    Dr. Tony Forshey, ODA

    Heidi Fought, Ohio Township Assn.

    Jerry Freewalt, Ohio Catholic Rural Life Mark Fritz, ODA

    Julie Funk, OSU

    Larry Gearhardt, Ohio Farm Bureau Ralph Haefner, USGS

    Tom Hafer, Marion SWCD Joe Haines, ODA

    David Hanselman, Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, ODA CAFF Committee Amanda Hargett, OSU Extension

    Elizabeth Harsh, Ohio Cattlemen's Assn. Kelly Harvey, ODA

    Bernard Heisner, COBA/Select Sires, Inc. Tom Hertzfeld, Sr., Ohio Poultry Assn.

    Kent Hoblet, OSU

    Leo Homan, Ohio Farmers Union Jim Hoops, State Representative Bill Hopper, ODA

    Pat Hord, Swine Producer

    Dick Isler, Ohio Pork Producers Peggy Jackson, ODA

    Rob Hamilton, ODNR

    Ron Kadesch, Ohio Family Farm Coalition

    Vicki Kadesch, Pauling County First John Kahle, Citizens of Putnam County Janice Kennedy, Concerned Citizens Jeff Layman, OSU

    Ritchie Laymon, Ohio Law Coalition Jeff LeJeune, OSU

    Maggie Lewis, OCDRCM

    Carl Link, Ohio Pork Producers, ODA CAFF Committee David Linkhart, OFSWCD

    Joe Logan, Ohio Farmers Union

    William Long, Ohio Farm Family Coalition Dick Lorenz, Westerville Water Division Lenny Losh

    Russell Ludwig, County Commissioners Association, ODA CAFF Committee Ed Luersman, Ohio Family Farm Coalition

    Laddie Marous, Ohio State Grange Alice McKenney, Tuscarawas SWCD

    Jason Menchhofer, Ohio Environmental Health Association, ODA CAFF Committee Thomas Menke, Menke Consulting, Inc.

    Terry Mescher, ODNR Mike Monnin, NRCS Dr. Bobby Moser, OSU

    Dr. Michael Mull, Ohio Veterinary Medical, ODA CAFF Committee Christine Pence, ODA

    Marsha Perge, ODA Lisa Pfeifer, OSU

    Tom Price, Public Representative, ODA CAFF Committee Irene Probasco, Ohio Alliance for the Environment Nancy Raeder, Ohio Farm Family Coalition

    John Rausch, OSU - Extension

    Christina Ritchey Wilson, Columbus Health Dept. Chris Rodabaugh, ODA

    Rob Russell, Protect Our Earth's Trees Bill Saville, OSU

    Peter Schade, Cuyahoga Co. Health Dept. David Schleich, ODA

    Heather Schofield, Ohio Dairy Farmers Federation Mike Schroeder, Windmill Swine Farms

    Bill Schwaderer, ODA Rendell Shira, Burch Hydro William Shulaw, OSU

    George Slater, Public Representative, ODA CAFF Committee Brent Sohngen, OSU

    Tom Sporleder, OSU

    Keith Stimpert, Ohio Farm Bureau Ralph Stonerock, Akey, Inc.

    Susan Sutherland, Ohio Environmental Health Assn. Mac Swinford, ODNR-Geo Survey

    Roger Tedrick, ODA

    Lisa Tharp, Ohio State Grange

    Jim Tobin, Catholic Conference of Ohio Curtis Truss, Ohio Water Environment Assn. Charles Twining, ODA

    Leon Weaver, Ohio Dairy Farmers Federation, ODA CAFF Committee Tim Weaver, Ohio Poultry Association, ODA CAFF Committee

    Dave White, Ohio Farm Bureau Mark Scarpitti, NRCS

    Adam Ward, ODA

    Rick Wilson, Ohio EPA Jim Young, ODA

    Gary Zwolinski, ODA

    Text Box: ACTION: Refiled                                                      Text Box: DATE: 11/25/2008 2:19 PM

    Environmental Rule Adoption/Amendment Form Attachment 2

    Index List:

    APHA (1992) Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater (18th edition). New York, NY.

    American Concrete Institute. 1992. 360R. Design of Slabs on Grade. Farmington Hills, MI.

    American Concrete Institute. 1999. 318. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete. Farmington Hills, MI.

    American Concrete Institute. (1999). 530. Building Code Requirements for Masonry Structures,

    Farmington Hills, MI.

    American Society of Agricultural Engineers (2001), Standards Engineering Practices Data, American Society of Agricultural Engineers (2001). Standards Engineering Practices Data. Data

    EP379.2. Control of Manure Odors. St. Joseph, MI.

    American Society of Agricultural Engineers Standards 2001. Standards Engineering Practices Data EP288.5 Agricultural Building Snow and Loads. St. Joseph, MI.

    American Society of Agricultural Engineers Standards 2001. Standards Engineering Practices Data EP378.3 Floor and Suspended Loads on Agricultural Structures Due to Use. St. Joseph, MI.

    American Society of Agricultural Engineers Standards 2001. Standards Engineering Practices Data EP393.3 Manure Storage. St. Joseph, MI.

    American Society For Testing and Materials (2001)Practice D2488-00 Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils (Visual-Manual Procedure). West Conshohocken, PA.

    American Society For Testing and Materials (2000) Terminology D653-97Standard Terminology Relating to Soil, Rock, and Contained Fluids. West Conshohocken, PA.

    Andraski, T.W., L.G. Bundy and K.R. Brye. (2000) Crop management and corn nitrogen rate effects on nitrate leaching. Journal of Environmental Quarterly 29: 1095-1103.

    Araji, A.A., and Z.O. Abdo, and P. Joyce (2001). Efficient use of animal manure on cropland: economic analysis. Biosource Technology 79: 179-191.

    *Arnold, G.J., R. Stowell and B. Strobel (1998). Manure Pit Ventilation Systems for Swine Operating Principles. AEX-150-98. Ohio State University Extension: Columbus, OH

    Barth, Clyde (1987) Operation and Maintenance of Livestock Waste Lagoons, Agricultural Manure Utilization and Management, American Society of Agricultural Engineers. St. Joseph, MI

    Barth, Clyde and Jelle Kroes (1985) Livestock Manure Lagoon Sludge Characterization.

    Agricultural Manure Utilization and Management, Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Agricultural Manure. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. St.

    Joseph, MI pp. 660-671

    1

    AATTTTAACCHpp((2471129747))  ppaa((3631940577))  dd((113988317068))  rraa((111780018350))

    pprriinntt ddaattee:: 1101//0215//22000088 29::1045 PPMM

    Barth, Clyde (1985) The Rational Design Standard for Anaerobic Livestock lagoons, Agricultural Manure Utilization and Management, Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Agricultural Manure. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. St. Joseph, MI p. 638- 647.

    *Chapman, S.L., G. Huitink, L. Barton, C.S. Snyder, and B.J. Hankins (1992). Best management guidelines for land application of dry poultry litter. Water Quality Information Article I-92. University of Arkansas, Cooperative Extension Service Bulletin, Little Rock, AR

    Chapman, S.L. (1995) Soil and solid poultry waste nutrient management and water quality. Poultry Science

    75: 862 -866.

    Cornell and Penn State Cooperative Extension, "Pest Management Recommendations for Dairy Cattle," Donald A. Rutz and Christopher J. Geden, Department of Entomology, Cornell University, and Charles W. Pitts, Department of Entomology, Penn State.

    Cornell University, Cornell Cooperative Extension, Department of Entomology, "Integrated Management of Flies in and around Dairy and Livestock Barns," D. Wes Watson, J. Keith Waldron, and Donald

    A.  Rutz, June 1994.

    David, M.B., L.E. Gentry, D.A. Kovacic, and K.M. Smith (1997). Nitrogen balance in and export from an agriculutural watershed. Journal of Environmental Quality 26: 1038-1048.

    *Eastridge, M.L. and S. Steele (2001). Questions Pertaining to Large Dairy Enterprises in Ohio: Regulations.

    AS-0008-01. Ohio State University Extension: Columbus, OH

    *M.L. Eastridge and S. Steele (2001). Questions Pertaining to Large Dairy Enterprises in Ohio: Regulations.

    AS-0009-01. Ohio State University Extension: Columbus, OH

    *M.L. Eastridge and S. Steele (2001). Questions Pertaining to Large Dairy Enterprises in Ohio: Regulations.

    AS-0010-01. Ohio State University Extension: Columbus, OH

    *M.L. Eastridge and S. Steele (2001). Questions Pertaining to Large Dairy Enterprises in Ohio: Regulations.

    AS-0011-01. Ohio State University Extension: Columbus, OH

    *Eghball, B., J.E. Gilley, L.A. Kramer, and T.B. Moorman (2000). Narrow grass hedge effects on phosphorus and nitrogen in runoff following manure and fertilizer application. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 55(2): 172-176.

    Eghball, B., G.D. Binford, and D.D. Baltensperger (1996). Phosphorus movement and adsorption in a soil receiving long-term manure and fertilizer application. Journal of Environmental Quality 25: 1339- 1343.

    Gilley, J.E. and L.M. Risse (2000). Runoff and soil loss as affected by the application of manure. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Vol. 43(6): 1583 - 1588.

    Godwin, D.C. and J.R. Miner (1996).  The potential of off-stream livestock watering to reduce water quality impacts. Biosource Technology 58: 285-290.

    Govindasamy, R., M. J. Cochran and E. Buchberger (1994). Economic implications of phosphorus loading policies for pasture land applications of poultry litter. Water Resources Bulletin Paper Number 93116 Vol. 30, No. 5: 901-910.

    2

    Henry, G.M., M.A. DeLorenzo, D.K. Beede, H.H. Van Horn, C.B. Moss and W.G. Boggess (1995).

    Determining optimal nutrient management strategies for dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science 78: 693-703.

    Insect and rodent control, rule 901:3-10-29 of the Ohio Administrative Code. Insect, rodent and animal control, rule 901:3-2-15 of the Ohio Administrative Code.

    Janzen, R.A., W.B. McGill, J.J. Leonard and S.R. Jeffery (1999). Manure as a resource - ecological and economic considerations in balance. American Society of Agricultural Engineers Vol. 42(5): 1261- 1273.

    Kohn, R.A., Z. Dou, J.D. Ferguson and R.C. Boston (1997). A sensitivity analysis of nitrogen losses from dairy farms. Journal of Environmental Management 50: 417-428.

    Kudva, I.T., K. Blanch and C.J. Hovde (1998). Analysis of escherichia coli O157:H7 survival in ovine or bovine manure and manure slurry. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 64: 3166-3174.

    Lanyon, L.E. (1994). Dairy manure and plant nutrient management issues affecting water quality and the dairy industry. Journal of Dairy Science 77: 1999-2007.

    *Leeds, R., L.C. Brown, M.R. Sulc, and L.VanLieshout (1994). Vegetative Filter Strips: Application, Installation and Maintenance. AEX-467-94. Ohio State University Extension: Columbus, OH

    *Mancl, K. and M.A. Veenhuizen (1991). Avoiding Stream Pollution from Animal Manure. AEX-708-91.

    Ohio State University Extension: Columbus, OH

    Manual of Steel Construction. 1991. American Institute of Steel Construction. Chicago, IL

    Manure Storages: MWPS-18 Section 2 (2001). C. Fulhage (University of Missouri), J. Hoehne (University of Missouri), D. Jones (Purdue University), R. Koelsch (University of Nebraska). Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.

    Midwest Plan Service. 1994. Concrete Manure Storages Handbook, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.

    Midwest Plan Service, 1987.  Beef Housing and Equipment Handbook, MWPS-6. Iowa State University, Ames, IA.

    MidWest Plan Service, 2000. Manure Characteristics - Manure Management Systems Series, MWPS-18 Section 1. Iowa State University, Ames, IA.

    MidWest Plan Service, 2000.  Dairy Freestall Housing and Equipment, MWPS-7

    MidWest Plan Service. 1993. Livestock Waste Facilities Handbook, MWPS-18, all chapters. Iowa State University, Ames, IA.

    Midwest Plan Service, TR-9: Circular Concrete Manure Tanks, March 1998, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.

    MidWest Plan Service Bulletin, MWPS-TR-9; 18-52; 18-51????????

    3

    Midwest Plan Service, 1983, Swine Housing and Equipment Handbook. MWPS-08, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.

    Miner, J.R. (1997) Nuisance concerns and odor control. Journal of Dairy Science 80: 2667-2672   Miner, J.R. (1999). Alternatives to minimize the environmental impact of large swine production units.

    Journal of Animal Sciences. 77:440-444.

    Mississippi State University, Mississippi State Extension Service, "Control Commensal Rodents In Poultry Houses," December 2, 1999.

    Moore, P.A. Jr., T.C. Daniel, A.N. Sharpley and C.W. Wood (1995). Poultry manure management: Environmentally sound options. Journal of Sol and Water Conservation 50(3): 321-327.

    Mueller, D.H., R.C. Wendt and T.C. Daniel (1984). Journal of the Soil Science Society of America 48:901-905.

    National Design Specifications for Wood Construction (1997), American Forest and Paper Association in 1997 National Design Specifications, International Conference of Building Officials. Whittier, CA.

    National Design Specification, 1999, NDS for Wood Construction.

    North Central Regional Research Publication No. 284, Manure Digestion, Runoff, Refeeding, Odors, MWPS-25, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.

    North Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station.  Recommended Chemical Soil Test Procedures for the North Central Region, North Central Region Committee on Soil Testing and Plant Analysis (NCR#13). USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1992. National Engineering Handbook, Part 651, Agricultural Waste Management Field Handbook, all chapters, USDA, Washington D.C.

    Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service, Dairy Free Stall Housing (1986), Harrisburg, PA.

    Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service, Dairy Manure Management, NRAES-31, 1989, Syracuse, New York.

    Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service, Dairy Manure Management from Barn to Storage. NRAES-108, 1998, Ithaca, New York.

    Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service, Dairy Reference Manual, 3rd Edition, NRAES- 63, Pennsylvania State University.

    Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service, Designing a Modern Milking Center, NRAES- 73, Rochester, New York.

    Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service, Animal Behavior and the Design of Livestock and Poultry Systems, 1995, Indianapolis, Indiana.

    Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service, On Farm Composting Handbook, NRAES-54, Ithaca, New York.

    4

    Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service, Earthen Manure Storage Design Considerations, 1999, Ithaca, New York.

    Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service, Cooperative Extension; Guideline for Milking Center Wastewater (1998). Ithaca, New York.

    Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service, Liquid Manure Application Systems Design Manual.

    Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service (1998). Liquid manure application systems design manual. Cooperative. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University-Cooperative Extension.

    Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service (1997), Post-Frame Building Handbook, Materials, Design Considerations, Construction Procedures

    Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service, 1999, Poultry Waste Management Handbook, NRAES-32, Ithaca, New York.

    Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service, Private Drinking Water Supplies, NRAES-47, Ithaca, New York.

    Ohio Department of Natural Resources (1996). Rainwater and Land Development: Ohio Standards (Second edition). D. Mecklenberg (ed.). Columbus, OH.

    Ohio Department of Natural Resources (1999).  Evaluating Ground Water Pollution Potential in Ohio (Drastic).

    Ohio Livestock Manure And Wastewater Management Guide - Bulletin 604. M. A. Veenhuizen, D.J. Eckert, K. Elder, J.W. Johnson, W.F. Lyon, K.M. Mancl and G. Schnitkey (1992).

    Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.

    The Ohio State University, College of veterinary medicine, "Rodent Control," Grasso M. Ebako, DVM, MS, MS.

    The Ohio State University, Ohio State University Extension, Livestock and Livestock Building Pest Management, Using Fly Parasites with Chemicals, Bulletin 473."

    The Ohio State University, Ohio State University Extension, "Poultry Pest Management Bulletin 853," William R. Lyon, 1995.

    The Ohio State University, Ohio State University Extension, "Pet Pest Management Bulletin 586," William R. Lyon, 1997.

    Parsons, R.L., J.W. Pease, and D.J. Bosh (1995) Simulating nitrogen losses from agricultural land: Implications for water quality and protection policy. Water Resources Bulletin, American Water Resources Association 31(6): 1079-1087.

    Pest Management Recommendations for Poultry, (2000) Department of Entomology, Penn State.

    Purdue University, Department of Entomology, Ralph E. Williams, "Focus on Flies: The Integrated Pest Management Approach."

    5

    Purdue University Extension, Using the Presidedress Nitrate Soil Test (PSNT) to Predict N Needs for Corn, David  Mengel, Extension Agronomist, AGRY 96-09 Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.

    Sauer, T.J., T.C. Daniel, P.A. Moore, Jr., K.P. Coffey, D.J. Nichols, and C.P. West (1999). Poultry litter and grazing animal waste effects on runoff water quality. Journal of Environmental Quality 28: 860-865.

    Sharpley, A. and B. Moyer (2000). Phosphorus forms in manure and compost and their release during simulated rainfall. Journal of Environmental Quality  29: 1462-1469.

    *Simeral, K.D. (1998). Using Constructed Wetlands for Removing Contaminants from Livestock Wastewater.

    A-5-98. Ohio State University Extension: Columbus, OH

    Tri-State Fertilizer Recommendations for Corn, Soybeans, Wheat and Alfalfa. Bulletin E-2567. East Lansing Michigan; Michigan State University. M.L. Vitosh (Michigan State University),

    J.W. Johnson (The Ohio State University ), and D.B. Mengel (Purdue University). (1995).

    The University of Florida, "Book of Insect Records," Department of Entomology and Nematology University of Florida, Gainesville, 2002.

    The University of Georgia-Department of Entomology, "Fly Control in Livestock Facilities, Dairy Barns, Swine Barns, Livestock Sheds, Other Animal Buildings," Craig Sheppard, Entomologist, March 6, 2001.

    The University of Nebraska, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, "Insects and Pests" 2001.

    USDA- Natural Resources Conservation Service (2001). Field Office Technical Guide: Section IV. Washington, DC/Columbus, OH.

    USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (2000). Conservation Practice Standard, CODE 359.

    Washington DC/Columbus, OH.

    USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (2001). Field Office Technical Guide: Section IV Conservation Practice Standard. Practice Nutrient Management Code 590. Columbus, OH.

    USDA- Natural Resources Conservation Service Conservation Practice Standard, Pest Management," Code 595, March, 2001.

    USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (2001). Field Office Technical Guide Conservation Practice Standard. Waste Utilization Code 633. Columbus, OH.

    USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Engineering Handbook, Part 651, Agricultural Waste Management Field Handbook, Chapter 7, Amendment OH7, Geology and Groundwater Considerations, May, 1999

    USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Engineering Handbook, Part 651, Agricultural Manure Management Field Handbook, Chapter 10, Amendment OH6 Settling Basin\Lagoon, April, 1998.

    USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1992. National Engineering Handbook, Part 651, Agricultural Waste Management Field Handbook, all chapters, USDA, Washington D.C.

    USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (2000). National Engineering Handbook-Part 651: Agricultural Waste Management Field Handbook. Washington, DC.

    6

    USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (2001). National Soil Survey Handbook. Washington, DC.

    .

    USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (1997). Engineering Field Manual: Chapters 1-19.

    Washington, DC.

    USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (2000). National Engineering Handbook-Part 393 Filter Strip Field Handbook. Washington, DC.

    USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (2000). National Engineering Handbook-Part 412: Grass Waterways Field Handbook. Washington, DC.

    USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (2000). National Engineering Handbook-Part 521-F Pond Sealing and Lining Field Handbook. Washington, DC.

    USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (2000). National Engineering Handbook-Part 561: Filter Strips Field Handbook. Washington, DC.

    USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Concrete Construction specification 210-VI-EFH, Amend OH-17, February 14, 2000.

    USDA Soil Conservation Service, 1989, Technical Release 74, Lateral Earth Pressures.

    Van Horn, H.H., A.C. Wilkie, W.J. Powers and R.A. Nordstedt (1993). Components of dairy manure management systems. Journal of Dairy Science 77: 2008-2030.

    Veenhuizen, M.A., D.J. Eckert, K. Elder, J. Johnson, W.F. Lyon, K.M. Mancl, and G. Schnitkey (eds.) (1992).

    Ohio Livestock Manure And Wastewater Management Guide. Bulletin 604. Ohio State University Extension: Columbus, OH

    Wilkerson, V.A., D.R. Mertens, and D.P. Casper (1997). Prediction of excretion of manure and nitrogen by Holstein dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 80: 3193-3204.

    Zahn, J.A., J.L. Hatfield, Y.S. Do, A.A. DiSpirito D.A. Laird, and R.L. Pfeiffer (1997). Characterization of volatile organic emissions and wastes from a swine production facility. Journal of Environmental Quality 26: 1687-1696.

    Zahn, J.A., J.L. Hatfield, D.A. Laird, T.T. Hart, Y.S. Do, and A.A. DiSpirito (2001). Functional classification of swine manure management systems based on effluent and gas emission characteristics. Journal of Environmental Quality 30: 635-647.

    Zublena, J.P., J.C. Barker, J.W. Parker, and C.M. Stanislaw (1993). Soil facts: swine manure as fertilizer source. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Statesville, NC.

    7