4715-12-01 Permissible practices of a dental assistant radiographer; supervision required; certificate to be displayed.  

  • Text Box: ACTION: Withdraw Proposed Text Box: DATE: 02/04/2014 3:14 PM

     

     

     

    Rule Summary and Fiscal Analysis (Part A)

     

    State Dental Board

    Agency Name

     

    Lili Reitz

    Division                                                                  Contact

     

    77 South High St. 18th Floor Columbus OH 43266-306

    614-466-2580

    Agency Mailing Address (Plus Zip)                                       Phone                     Fax

    lilireitz@mail.peps.state.oh.us

    Email

    4715-12-01

    Rule Number

    AMENDMENT

    TYPE of rule filing

    Rule Title/Tag Line              Permissible  practices  of  a  dental  assistant  radiographer;

    supervision required; certificate to be displayed.

    RULE SUMMARY

    1.  Is the rule being filed consistent with the requirements of the RC 119.032 review? Yes

    2.  Are you proposing this rule as a result of recent legislation? No

    3.  Statute prescribing the procedure in accordance with the agency is required to adopt the rule: 119.03

    4.  Statute(s) authorizing agency to adopt the rule: 4715.39, 4715.53

    5.  Statute(s) the rule, as filed, amplifies or implements: 4715.53, 4715.56

    6.  State the reason(s) for proposing (i.e., why are you filing,) this rule:

    Rule is being filed pursuant to 119.03 rule review.

    7.  If the rule is an AMENDMENT, then summarize the changes and the content of the proposed rule; If the rule type is RESCISSION, NEW or NO CHANGE, then summarize the content of the rule:

    Amendments to rule allow for greater flexibility regarding evidence and/or display of current certificate.

    8.  If the rule incorporates a text or other material by reference and the agency claims the incorporation by reference is exempt from compliance with sections

    121.71 to 121.74 of the Revised Code because the text or other material is generally available to persons who reasonably can be expected to be affected by the rule, provide an explanation of how the text or other material is generally available to those persons:

    This response left blank because filer specified online that the rule does not incorporate a text or other material by reference.

    9.  If the rule incorporates a text or other material by reference, and it was infeasible for the agency to file the text or other material electronically, provide an explanation of why filing the text or other material electronically was infeasible:

    This response left blank because filer specified online that the rule does not incorporate a text or other material by reference.

    10.  If the rule is being rescinded and incorporates a text or other material by reference, and it was infeasible for the agency to file the text or other material, provide an explanation of why filing the text or other material was infeasible:

    Not Applicable.

    11.  If revising or refiling this rule, identify changes made from the previously filed version of this rule; if none, please state so. If applicable, indicate each specific paragraph of the rule that has been modified:

    Not Applicable.

    12. 119.032 Rule Review Date: 1/3/2014

    (If the rule is not exempt and you answered NO to question No. 1, provide the scheduled review date. If you answered YES to No. 1, the review date for this rule is the filing date.)

    NOTE: If the rule is not exempt at the time of final filing, two dates are required: the current review date plus a date not to exceed 5 years from the effective date for Amended rules or a date not to exceed 5 years from the review date for No Change rules.

    FISCAL ANALYSIS

    13.  Estimate the total amount by which this proposed rule would increase / decrease either revenues / expenditures for the agency during the current biennium (in dollars): Explain the net impact of the proposed changes to the budget of your agency/department.

    This will have no impact on revenues or expenditures. 0.00

    N/A

    14.  Identify the appropriation (by line item etc.) that authorizes each expenditure necessitated by the proposed rule:

    N/A

    15.  Provide a summary of the estimated cost of compliance with the rule to all directly affected persons. When appropriate, please include the source for your information/estimated costs, e.g. industry, CFR, internal/agency:

    N/A

    16.  Does this rule have a fiscal effect on school districts, counties, townships, or municipal corporations? No

    17.  Does this rule deal with environmental protection or contain a component dealing with environmental protection as defined in R. C. 121.39? No

    S.B. 2 (129th General Assembly) Questions

    18.  Has this rule been filed with the Common Sense Initiative Office pursuant to

    R.C. 121.82? Yes

    19.  Specific to this rule, answer the following:

    A.) Does this rule require a license, permit, or any other prior authorization to engage in or operate a line of business? Yes

    Rule specifies that those individuals seeking to perform radiologic procedures in a dental office must hold a current certificate from the Board.

    B.) Does this rule impose a criminal penalty, a civil penalty, or another sanction, or create a cause of action, for failure to comply with its terms? Yes

    Rule sets forth guidelines for issuance and regulation of certificates for dental assistant radiographers. If violations are found, then sanctions may be imposed on regulated individuals.

    C.) Does this rule require specific expenditures or the report of information as a condition of compliance? Yes

    Rule specifies that Board-issued certificates must be maintained/displayed on the premises wherein the dental assistant radiographer is performing radiologic procedures.