4123-6-16 Alternative dispute resolution for HPP medical issues.  

  • Text Box: ACTION: Final Text Box: DATE: 03/19/2007 12:52 PM

     

     

     

    4123-6-16                    Dispute resolution for HPP medical issues.

     

     

     

    (A)   This rule shall provide for procedures for the resolution of medical disputes that may arise between any of the following: an employer, an employee, a provider, the bureau, or an MCO. This rule applies to reviews of records, medical disputes arising over issues such as, but not limited, to quality assurance, utilization review, determinations that a service provided to an employee is not covered, is covered or is medically unnecessary; or involving individual health care providers. Within fourteen days of receipt of written notice of an MCO determination giving rise to a medical dispute, an employee, employer, or provider may request, in writing, that the MCO initiate the medical dispute resolution process provided for in paragraph

    (C) of this rule. Such written request must comply with paragraph (F) of this rule.

     

    (B)   An employee or employer must exhaust the dispute resolution procedures of this rule prior to filing an appeal under section 4123.511 of the Revised Code on an issue relating to the delivery of medical services.

     

    (C)   Any MCO participating in the bureau's HPP must have a medical dispute resolution process that includes one independent level of review. Except as provided below, if an individual health care provider is involved in the dispute, the independent level of review shall consist of a peer review conducted by an individual or individuals licensed pursuant to the same section of the Revised Code as the health care provider. The MCO must identify the providers performing the peer review. If the MCO receives a dispute where the requested treatment appears to be the same as or similar to a previous treatment request for which the MCO conducted a peer review pursuant to this rule, and the previous treatment request was ultimately denied based on the peer review, the MCO may refer the new dispute to the bureau for a determination as to whether peer review is needed for the independent level of review in the new dispute. If the MCO receives a dispute where the requested treatment appears to be the same as or similar to a previous treatment request for which the MCO conducted a peer review pursuant to this rule, and the previous treatment request is pending before the bureau or industrial commission, the MCO may defer consideration of the new dispute until the previous treatment request is resolved. Once the previous treatment request has been resolved, the MCO shall refer the new dispute to the bureau for a determination as to whether peer review is needed for the independent level of review in the new dispute and shall resume the dispute resolution process under this rule. If, upon consideration of additional evidence or after negotiation with the party requesting dispute resolution, the MCO reverses the determination under dispute or otherwise resolves the dispute to the satisfaction of the party, the MCO may issue a new determination and dismiss the dispute without prejudice. The MCO must complete its internal medical dispute resolution process and must notify the parties to the dispute and their representatives of the decision in writing within twenty-one days of notice of a dispute. The twenty-one days shall be measured from the time the written notice of the medical dispute is received by the MCO. However, if the MCO elects to refer the  employee  for  an  independent  medical  examination  as  part  of  the  dispute

     

     

    resolution process, the MCO shall have thirty days to complete its internal medical dispute resolution process and notify the parties to the dispute and their representatives of the decision in writing. Upon written notice of the dispute, the MCO shall inform the bureau local customer service team of the dispute. Notice of the medical dispute received by telephone only does not constitute formal notification as described in this paragraph. Within seven days of receipt of written notice of the MCO's decision, the employer, injured worker or provider may request, in writing, that the dispute be referred to the bureau for an independent review. Such written request must comply with paragraph (F) of this rule. The MCO shall refer the requested dispute to the bureau within seven days of written notice of the request. All disputes shall be referred by the MCO to the bureau within seven days of the expiration of the referral period for tracking purposes.

    (D)     Upon receipt of an unresolved medical dispute from the MCO, if the bureau determines that the MCO has not satisfactorily completed its internal medical dispute resolution process as set forth in paragraph (C) of this rule and the MCO contract, the bureau may return the dispute to the MCO for completion. The return of a dispute to the MCO pursuant to this rule does not toll the MCO's time frame for completing disputes. Within fourteen days after receipt of a completed, unresolved medical dispute from the MCO, the bureau shall conduct  an independent review of the unresolved medical dispute received from the MCO and enter a final bureau order pursuant to section 4123.511 of the Revised Code. The bureau order may include a determination that the employee be scheduled for an independent medical examination; however, this determination does not toll the bureau's time frame for completing disputes. This order shall be mailed to all parties  and  may  be  appealed  to  the  industrial  commission  pursuant  to  section

    4123.511 of the Revised Code. Neither the provider nor the MCO is a party entitled to file an appeal under section 4123.511 of the Revised Code.

    (E)   If an MCO receives a medical treatment reimbursement request for consideration of an issue relating to the delivery of medical services for a condition or part of the body that is not allowed in the claim, the MCO may deny the request for the reason that the condition or part of the body is not allowed in the claim. The provider may recommend an additional allowance on a recommendation for additional conditions form (Form C-9 or equivalent) with supporting medical evidence, or the claimant may file a motion requesting an additional allowance. The bureau shall review the recommendation or motion and shall consider the additional allowance. If a party has requested medical dispute resolution of the issue under this rule while the motion or issue on the allowance of the additional condition is pending before the bureau, the MCO may defer consideration of the dispute until the issue of the allowance of the additional condition is resolved, notwithstanding the time limits for resolution of the dispute as provided in paragraph (C) of this rule. Once the bureau has made a decision on the additional allowance, the MCO shall resume the dispute resolution process under this rule. If a dispute is filed where the claimant has not filed a motion for allowance of the condition or the bureau has not allowed

    the condition as recommended by the provider on the treatment plan form, the MCO may refer the matter directly to the bureau for an order under paragraph (D) of this rule.

    (F) If the MCO receives a dispute where the requested treatment relates to the delivery of medical services that have been approved by the MCO pursuant to standard treatment guidelines, pathways, or presumptive authorization guidelines, the MCO may refer the matter directly to the bureau for an order under paragraph (D) of this rule.

    (F)(G) A written request to initiate the medical dispute resolution process under paragraph (A) of this rule or to refer the dispute to the bureau for an independent review under paragraph (C) of this rule (written appeal request) must contain, at a minimum, the following elements (form C-11 or equivalent):

    (1)   Injured worker name.

    (2)   Injured worker claim number.

    (3)      Date  of  initial  medical  treatment  reimbursement  request  (form  C-9  or equivalent) in dispute.

    (4)        Specific   issue(s)    in    dispute,   including     description,    frequency/duration, beginning/ending dates, and type of treatment/service/body part.

    (5)   Name of party making written appeal request.

    (6)       Signature  of  party  making  written  appeal  request  or  their  authorized representative.

    Only one medical treatment reimbursement request (form C-9 or equivalent) may be addressed in a single written appeal request under paragraph (A) or paragraph

    (C) of this rule.

    Written appeal requests that do not contain the minimum elements set forth in this paragraph may be dismissed without prejudice by the MCO or bureau.

    Effective:

    04/01/2007

    R.C. 119.032 review dates:

    03/01/2009

     

    CERTIFIED ELECTRONICALLY

     

    Certification

     

     

    03/19/2007

     

    Date

     

     

    Promulgated Under:

     

    119.03

    Statutory Authority:

    4121.12, 4121.121, 4121.30, 4121.31, 4123.05

    Rule Amplifies:

    Prior Effective Dates:

    4121.121, 4121.44, 4121.441, 4123.66

    2/16/96; 6/6/97; 1/1/99; 11/8/99; 1/1/01; 1/1/03

Document Information

Effective Date:
4/1/2007
File Date:
2007-03-19
Last Day in Effect:
2007-04-01
Rule File:
4123-6-16_PH_FF_A_RU_20070319_1252.pdf
Related Chapter/Rule NO.: (1)
Ill. Adm. Code 4123-6-16. Alternative dispute resolution for HPP medical issues