4501-7-13 Records for online and class "D" licensed schools.  

  • Text Box: ACTION: To Be Refiled Text Box: DATE: 04/18/2013 4:04 PM

     

     

     

    Rule Summary and Fiscal Analysis (Part A)

     

    Department of Public Safety

    Agency Name

     

    Anna Firestone

    Division                                                                  Contact

     

    Ohio Department of Public Safety 1970 West Broad Street, Suite 531 Columbus OH 43223-0000

    614-466-7014

    Agency Mailing Address (Plus Zip)                                       Phone                     Fax

    afirestone@dps.state.oh.us

    Email

    4501-7-13

    Rule Number

    RESCISSION

    TYPE of rule filing

    Rule Title/Tag Line              Class "D" license school records.

    RULE SUMMARY

    1.  Is the rule being filed consistent with the requirements of the RC 119.032 review? Yes

    2.  Are you proposing this rule as a result of recent legislation? No

    3.  Statute prescribing the procedure in accordance with the agency is required to adopt the rule: 119.03

    4.  Statute(s) authorizing agency to adopt the rule: R.C. 4508.02

    5.  Statute(s) the rule, as filed, amplifies or implements: R.C.4508.02, R.C. 4508.03

    6.  State the reason(s) for proposing (i.e., why are you filing,) this rule:

    This rule is being proposed for rescission due to the fifty percent guideline. It is estimated that changes to the rule strike approximately half of the existing text while adding a comparable amount of new text. This rule is simultaneously being proposed as a new rule under the same rule number.

    7.  If the rule is an AMENDMENT, then summarize the changes and the content

    of the proposed rule; If the rule type is RESCISSION, NEW or NO CHANGE, then summarize the content of the rule:

    This rule sets forth required paperwork to be maintained and provided for each student taking the course. The rules requires a roster of all student attending each session, a classroom training record specific to each student, and a

    behind-the-wheel record showing dates, times and topic of instruction for each time. Instructors and students must sign the records. The enterprise is also responsible to maintain all records relating to their instructors, licenses and applications. The enterprises must maintain all records pertaining to the application and renewal for the school(s) licenses. The rule sets forth the requirements for printing and issuing certificates completion of the mandatory twenty-four and eight hour course. The rule requires the records to be maintained for at least three years and shall be made available upon request.

    8.  If the rule incorporates a text or other material by reference and the agency claims the incorporation by reference is exempt from compliance with sections

    121.71 to 121.74 of the Revised Code because the text or other material is generally available to persons who reasonably can be expected to be affected by the rule, provide an explanation of how the text or other material is generally available to those persons:

    This response left blank because filer specified online that the rule does not incorporate a text or other material by reference.

    9.  If the rule incorporates a text or other material by reference, and it was infeasible for the agency to file the text or other material electronically, provide an explanation of why filing the text or other material electronically was infeasible:

    This response left blank because filer specified online that the rule does not incorporate a text or other material by reference.

    10.  If the rule is being rescinded and incorporates a text or other material by reference, and it was infeasible for the agency to file the text or other material, provide an explanation of why filing the text or other material was infeasible:

    This response left blank because filer specified online that the rule does not incorporate a text or other materials by reference.

    11.  If revising or refiling this rule, identify changes made from the previously filed version of this rule; if none, please state so. If applicable, indicate each specific paragraph of the rule that has been modified:

    Not Applicable.

    12. 119.032 Rule Review Date: 3/28/2013

    (If the rule is not exempt and you answered NO to question No. 1, provide the scheduled review date. If you answered YES to No. 1, the review date for this rule is the filing date.)

    NOTE: If the rule is not exempt at the time of final filing, two dates are required: the current review date plus a date not to exceed 5 years from the effective date for Amended rules or a date not to exceed 5 years from the review date for No Change rules.

    FISCAL ANALYSIS

    13.  Estimate the total amount by which this proposed rule would increase / decrease either revenues / expenditures for the agency during the current biennium (in dollars): Explain the net impact of the proposed changes to the budget of your agency/department.

    This will have no impact on revenues or expenditures. 0

    The rescission of this rule is not expected to impact the agency's budget in the current biennium.

    14.  Identify the appropriation (by line item etc.) that authorizes each expenditure necessitated by the proposed rule:

    N/A

    15.  Provide a summary of the estimated cost of compliance with the rule to all directly affected persons. When appropriate, please include the source for your information/estimated costs, e.g. industry, CFR, internal/agency:

    It is anticipated that the proposed rescission of this rule will not result in any cost of compliance for stakeholders.

    16.  Does this rule have a fiscal effect on school districts, counties, townships, or municipal corporations? Yes

    You must complete Part B of the Rule Summary and Fiscal Analysis in order to comply with Am. Sub. S.B. 33 of the 120th General Assembly.

    17.  Does this rule deal with environmental protection or contain a component dealing with environmental protection as defined in R. C. 121.39? No

    S.B. 2 (129th General Assembly) Questions

    18.  Has this rule been filed with the Common Sense Initiative Office pursuant to

    R.C. 121.82? Yes

    19.  Specific to this rule, answer the following:

    A.) Does this rule require a license, permit, or any other prior authorization to engage in or operate a line of business? Yes

    Pursuant to sections 4508.03 and 4508.04 of the Revised Code, no person shall operate a driver training school or act as a driver training instructor unless licensed by the director of public safety.

    B.) Does this rule impose a criminal penalty, a civil penalty, or another sanction, or create a cause of action, for failure to comply with its terms? Yes

    Yes, sanctions up to and including denial of application or revocation of license may be imposed if applicants or licensees fail to meet the requirements established in this rule.

    C.) Does this rule require specific expenditures or the report of information as a condition of compliance? No

    It is anticipated that the proposed rescission of this rule will not result in any cost of compliance for stakeholders.

    Text Box: ACTION: To Be Refiled                                                                                                                                              Text Box: DATE: 04/18/2013 4:04 PM

    Page B-1                                                                                     Rule Number: 4501-7-13

    Rule Summary and Fiscal Analysis (Part B)

    1.  Does the Proposed rule have a fiscal effect on any of the following?

    (a)  School Districts

    (b)    Counties                                 (c) Townships           (d) Municipal

    Corporations

    Yes                              No                               No                                No

    2.  Please provide an estimate in dollars of the cost of compliance with the proposed rule for school districts, counties, townships, or municipal corporations. If you are unable to provide an estimate in dollars, please provide a written explanation of why it is not possible to provide such an estimate.

    It is anticipated that the proposed rescission of this rule will not result in any cost of compliance for stakeholders.

    3.  If the proposed rule is the result of a federal requirement, does the proposed rule exceed the scope and intent of the federal requirement? No

    4.  If the proposed rule exceeds the minimum necessary federal requirement, please provide an estimate of, and justification for, the excess costs that exceed the cost of the federal requirement. In particular, please provide an estimate of the excess costs that exceed the cost of the federal requirement for (a) school districts, (b) counties, (c) townships, and (d) municipal corporations.

    Not Applicable.

    5.  Please provide a comprehensive cost estimate for the proposed rule that includes the procedure and method used for calculating the cost of compliance. This comprehensive cost estimate should identify all of the major cost categories including, but not limited to, (a) personnel costs, (b) new equipment or other capital costs, (c) operating costs, and (d) any indirect central service costs.

    It is anticipated that the proposed rescission of this rule will not result in any cost of compliance for stakeholders.

    (a)  Personnel Costs

    0

    Page B-2                                                                                     Rule Number: 4501-7-13

    (b)  New Equipment or Other Capital Costs

    0

    (c)  Operating Costs

    0

    (d)  Any Indirect Central Service Costs

    0

    (e)  Other Costs

    0

    6.  Please provide a written explanation of the agency's and the local government's ability to pay for the new requirements imposed by the proposed rule.

    It is anticipated that the proposed rescission of this rule will not result in any cost of compliance for stakeholders.

    7.  Please provide a statement on the proposed rule's impact on economic development.

    It is anticipated that the proposed rescission of this rule will not result in any cost of compliance for stakeholders.