3772-11-39 Table games jackpot; employee pocketbooks.

 

 

 

Rule Summary and Fiscal Analysis (Part A)

 

Ohio Casino Control Commission

Agency Name

 

Michelle Siba

Division                                                                  Contact

 

10 W. Broad St. 6th floor Columbus OH 43215-0000 614-387-0485

Agency Mailing Address (Plus Zip)                                       Phone                     Fax

 

[e-mail]

Email

 

 

 

3772-11-39

Rule Number

RESCISSION

TYPE of rule filing

Rule Title/Tag Line              Table games jackpot; employee pocketbooks.

RULE SUMMARY

1.  Is the rule being filed for five year review (FYR)? Yes

2.  Are you proposing this rule as a result of recent legislation? No

3.  Statute prescribing the procedure in accordance with the agency is required to adopt the rule: 119.03

4.  Statute(s) authorizing agency to adopt the rule: 3772.03; 3772.033

5.  Statute(s) the rule, as filed, amplifies or implements: 3772.03; 3772.033

6.  State the reason(s) for proposing (i.e., why are you filing,) this rule:

This rule being rescinded and replaced with new rule 3772-11-39, pursuant to LSC's 50% Guideline (Rule 4.3.1).

7.  If the rule is an AMENDMENT, then summarize the changes and the content of the proposed rule; If the rule type is RESCISSION, NEW or NO CHANGE, then summarize the content of the rule:

This rule being rescinded and replaced with new rule 3772-11-39, pursuant to LSC's 50% Guideline (Rule 4.3.1). Presently, the rule is titled "Table games

jackpot; employee pocketbooks" and contains requirements for the forms used to pay a table game jackpot or manual jackpot. It also prohibited employees from carrying a pocketbook into a pit area unless that pocketbook was transparent. The jackpot payout requirements have been moved to Ohio Adm. Code 3772-10-21. The pocketbook restriction will be addressed in each casino operator's Commission-approved internal controls. The new language contains minimum requirements that a casino operator must have in its internal controls regarding the inspection and maintenance of roulette tables, roulette wheels, and other table games mechanisms.

8.  If the rule incorporates a text or other material by reference and the agency claims the incorporation by reference is exempt from compliance with sections

121.71 to 121.74 of the Revised Code because the text or other material is generally available to persons who reasonably can be expected to be affected by the rule, provide an explanation of how the text or other material is generally available to those persons:

This response left blank because filer specified online that the rule does not incorporate a text or other material by reference.

9.  If the rule incorporates a text or other material by reference, and it was infeasible for the agency to file the text or other material electronically, provide an explanation of why filing the text or other material electronically was infeasible:

This response left blank because filer specified online that the rule does not incorporate a text or other material by reference.

10.  If the rule is being rescinded and incorporates a text or other material by reference, and it was infeasible for the agency to file the text or other material, provide an explanation of why filing the text or other material was infeasible:

This response left blank because filer specified online that the rule does not incorporate a text or other materials by reference.

11.  If revising or refiling this rule, identify changes made from the previously filed version of this rule; if none, please state so. If applicable, indicate each specific paragraph of the rule that has been modified:

Revised filing to describe reporting requirement in RSFA. No changes to rule language.

12.  Five Year Review (FYR) Date: 6/24/2016

(If the rule is not exempt and you answered NO to question No. 1, provide the scheduled review date. If you answered YES to No. 1, the review date for this rule is the filing date.)

NOTE: If the rule is not exempt at the time of final filing, two dates are required: the current review date plus a date not to exceed 5 years from the effective date for Amended rules or a date not to exceed 5 years from the review date for No Change rules.

FISCAL ANALYSIS

13.  Estimate the total amount by which this proposed rule would increase / decrease either revenues / expenditures for the agency during the current biennium (in dollars): Explain the net impact of the proposed changes to the budget of your agency/department.

This will have no impact on revenues or expenditures. 0

N/A

14.  Identify the appropriation (by line item etc.) that authorizes each expenditure necessitated by the proposed rule:

N/A

15.  Provide a summary of the estimated cost of compliance with the rule to all directly affected persons. When appropriate, please include the source for your information/estimated costs, e.g. industry, CFR, internal/agency:

This rule being rescinded and replaced with new rule 3772-11-39, pursuant to LSC's 50% Guideline (Rule 4.3.1). A description of the summary and cost of compliance is included in the RSFA of the new rule.

16.  Does this rule have a fiscal effect on school districts, counties, townships, or municipal corporations? No

17.  Does this rule deal with environmental protection or contain a component dealing with environmental protection as defined in R. C. 121.39? No

S.B. 2 (129th General Assembly) Questions

18.  Has this rule been filed with the Common Sense Initiative Office pursuant to

R.C. 121.82? Yes

19.  Specific to this rule, answer the following:

A.) Does this rule require a license, permit, or any other prior authorization to engage in or operate a line of business? Yes

This rule being rescinded and replaced with new rule 3772-11-39, pursuant to LSC's 50% Guideline (Rule 4.3.1). A description of the license(s) required is included in the RSFA of the new rule.

B.) Does this rule impose a criminal penalty, a civil penalty, or another sanction, or create a cause of action, for failure to comply with its terms? No

C.) Does this rule require specific expenditures or the report of information as a condition of compliance? Yes

This rule being rescinded and replaced with new rule 3772-11-39, pursuant to LSC's

50% Guideline (Rule 4.3.1). An analysis of the specific expenditures and/or report of information as a condition of compliance is included in the RSFA of the new rule.