5101:9-6-19 State child protective allocation (SCPA).  

  • Text Box: ACTION: Original Text Box: DATE: 09/16/2011 2:37 PM

     

     

     

    Rule Summary and Fiscal Analysis (Part A)

     

    Department of Job and Family Services

    Agency Name

     

    ODJFS Practices                                                 Nancy Van Kirk

    Division                                                                  Contact

     

    30 E Broad St 31st Floor ODJFS Office of Legal Services Columbus OH 43215-3414

    614-466-4605        614-752-8298

    Agency Mailing Address (Plus Zip)                                       Phone                     Fax

    5101:9-6-19

    Rule Number

    AMENDMENT

    TYPE of rule filing

    Rule Title/Tag Line              State child protective allocation (SCPA).

    RULE SUMMARY

    1.  Is the rule being filed consistent with the requirements of the RC 119.032 review? No

    2.  Are you proposing this rule as a result of recent legislation? Yes

    Bill Number: HB153               General Assembly: 129           Sponsor: Amstutz

    3.  Statute prescribing the procedure in accordance with the agency is required to adopt the rule: 111.15

    4.  Statute(s) authorizing agency to adopt the rule: 5101.14

    5.  Statute(s) the rule, as filed, amplifies or implements: 5101.14, Section 309.50.20 of Am. Sub. H.B. 153, 129th G.A.

    6.  State the reason(s) for proposing (i.e., why are you filing,) this rule:

    To update policy relating to the administration of the State Child Protective Allocation (SCPA)and to implement provisions of Section 307.50.20 of Am. Sub.

    H.B. 153 of the 129th General Assembly related to the SCPA.

    7.  If the rule is an AMENDMENT, then summarize the changes and the content of the proposed rule; If the rule type is RESCISSION, NEW or NO CHANGE,

    then summarize the content of the rule:

    This rule outlines funding for the State Child Protective Allocation (SCPA) for the purpose of meeting the expenses of the children services program. Changes include incorporating funding formerly distributed under the Fiesel Allocation outlined in rescinded rule 5101:9-6-34. In addition, in accordance with section 309.50.20 of Am. Sub. H.B. 153 of the 129th General Assembly, language has been included to allow a public children services agency to transfer all or a portion of the SCPA to the different county Family and Children First Councils.

    8.  If the rule incorporates a text or other material by reference and the agency claims the incorporation by reference is exempt from compliance with sections

    121.71 to 121.74 of the Revised Code because the text or other material is generally available to persons who reasonably can be expected to be affected by the rule, provide an explanation of how the text or other material is generally available to those persons:

    This rule incorporates one or more references to the Ohio Revised Code. This question is not applicable to any incorporation by reference to the Ohio Revised Code because such reference is exempt from compliance with R.C. 121.71 to

    121.74 pursuant to R.C. 121.76(A)(1).

    This rule incorporates one or more references to another rule or rules of the Administrative Code. This question is not applicable to any incorporation by reference to another OAC rule because such reference is exempt from compliance with R.C. 121.71 to 121.74 pursuant to R.C.(A)(3).

    9.  If the rule incorporates a text or other material by reference, and it was infeasible for the agency to file the text or other material electronically, provide an explanation of why filing the text or other material electronically was infeasible:

    Not Applicable.

    10.  If the rule is being rescinded and incorporates a text or other material by reference, and it was infeasible for the agency to file the text or other material, provide an explanation of why filing the text or other material was infeasible:

    Not Applicable.

    11.  If revising or refiling this rule, identify changes made from the previously filed version of this rule; if none, please state so:

    Not Applicable.

    12. 119.032 Rule Review Date: 11/1/2015

    (If the rule is not exempt and you answered NO to question No. 1, provide the scheduled review date. If you answered YES to No. 1, the review date for this rule is the filing date.)

    NOTE: If the rule is not exempt at the time of final filing, two dates are required: the current review date plus a date not to exceed 5 years from the effective date for Amended rules or a date not to exceed 5 years from the review date for No Change rules.

    FISCAL ANALYSIS

    13.  Estimate the total amount by which this proposed rule would increase / decrease either revenues / expenditures for the agency during the current biennium (in dollars): Explain the net impact of the proposed changes to the budget of your agency/department.

    This will have no impact on revenues or expenditures.

    $0

    No impact on current budget.

    14.  Identify the appropriation (by line item etc.) that authorizes each expenditure necessitated by the proposed rule:

    No new costs.

    15.  Provide a summary of the estimated cost of compliance with the rule to all directly affected persons. When appropriate, please include the source for your information/estimated costs, e.g. industry, CFR, internal/agency:

    No new costs.

    16.  Does this rule have a fiscal effect on school districts, counties, townships, or municipal corporations? Yes

    You must complete Part B of the Rule Summary and Fiscal Analysis in order to comply with Am. Sub. S.B. 33 of the 120th General Assembly.

    17.  Does this rule deal with environmental protection or contain a component dealing with environmental protection as defined in R. C. 121.39? No

    Text Box: ACTION: Original                                                                                                                                              Text Box: DATE: 09/16/2011 2:37 PM

    Page B-1                                                                                  Rule Number: 5101:9-6-19

    Rule Summary and Fiscal Analysis (Part B)

    1.  Does the Proposed rule have a fiscal effect on any of the following?

    (a)  School Districts

    (b)    Counties                                 (c) Townships           (d) Municipal

    Corporations

    No                                Yes                              No                                No

    2.  Please provide an estimate in dollars of the cost of compliance with the proposed rule for school districts, counties, townships, or municipal corporations. If you are unable to provide an estimate in dollars, please provide a written explanation of why it is not possible to provide such an estimate.

    There is no cost of compliance.

    3.  If the proposed rule is the result of a federal requirement, does the proposed rule exceed the scope and intent of the federal requirement? No

    4.  If the proposed rule exceeds the minimum necessary federal requirement, please provide an estimate of, and justification for, the excess costs that exceed the cost of the federal requirement. In particular, please provide an estimate of the excess costs that exceed the cost of the federal requirement for (a) school districts, (b) counties, (c) townships, and (d) municipal corporations.

    Not Applicable.

    5.  Please provide a comprehensive cost estimate for the proposed rule that includes the procedure and method used for calculating the cost of compliance. This comprehensive cost estimate should identify all of the major cost categories including, but not limited to, (a) personnel costs, (b) new equipment or other capital costs, (c) operating costs, and (d) any indirect central service costs.

    No comprehensive costs.

    (a)  Personnel Costs

    0.0

    (b)  New Equipment or Other Capital Costs

    Page B-2                                                                                  Rule Number: 5101:9-6-19

    0.0

    (c)  Operating Costs

    0.0

    (d)  Any Indirect Central Service Costs

    0.0

    (e)  Other Costs

    0.0

    6.  Please provide a written explanation of the agency's and the local government's ability to pay for the new requirements imposed by the proposed rule.

    No costs associated with changes to this rule.

    7.  Please provide a statement on the proposed rule's impact on economic development.

    The amendment of the rule will not result in an economic impact for counties. The change may impact how counties budget their funding.