1501:47-3-97 No wake operation on the waters of Jackson lake - pilot program.  

  • Text Box: ACTION: Revised Text Box: DATE: 03/31/2014 4:27 PM

     

     

     

    Rule Summary and Fiscal Analysis (Part A)

     

    Department of Natural Resources

    Agency Name

     

    Division of Watercraft                                        Brock Miskimen

    Division                                                                  Contact

     

    2045 Morse Road Bldg. D-3 Columbus OH 43229-6693

    614-265-6885

    Agency Mailing Address (Plus Zip)                                       Phone                     Fax

    Brock.Miskimen@dnr.state.oh.us

    Email

    1501:47-3-97

    Rule Number

    NEW

    TYPE of rule filing

    Rule Title/Tag Line              No  wake  operation  on  the  waters  of  Hargus  lake  -  pilot

    program.

    RULE SUMMARY

    1.  Is the rule being filed consistent with the requirements of the RC 119.032 review? No

    2.  Are you proposing this rule as a result of recent legislation? No

    3.  Statute prescribing the procedure in accordance with the agency is required to adopt the rule: 119.03

    4.  Statute(s) authorizing agency to adopt the rule: 1547.52, 1547.61

    5.  Statute(s) the rule, as filed, amplifies or implements: 1547.52, 1547.61

    6.  State the reason(s) for proposing (i.e., why are you filing,) this rule:

    To put a two-year pilot program into place allowing the use of motors other than electric motors to operate on the waters of A.W. Marion state park at no-wake speed.

    7.  If the rule is an AMENDMENT, then summarize the changes and the content

    of the proposed rule; If the rule type is RESCISSION, NEW or NO CHANGE, then summarize the content of the rule:

    The rule allows watercraft of any horsepower to utilize the waters of Hargus lake at

    A.W. Marion state park as long as such craft are operated at no-wake speed. The horsepower limits will revert to the current restriction of electric motors not exceeding four horsepower on November 1, 2015 unless a permanent rule change is adopted prior to that date.

    8.  If the rule incorporates a text or other material by reference and the agency claims the incorporation by reference is exempt from compliance with sections

    121.71 to 121.74 of the Revised Code because the text or other material is generally available to persons who reasonably can be expected to be affected by the rule, provide an explanation of how the text or other material is generally available to those persons:

    This response left blank because filer specified online that the rule does not incorporate a text or other material by reference.

    9.  If the rule incorporates a text or other material by reference, and it was infeasible for the agency to file the text or other material electronically, provide an explanation of why filing the text or other material electronically was infeasible:

    This response left blank because filer specified online that the rule does not incorporate a text or other material by reference.

    10.  If the rule is being rescinded and incorporates a text or other material by reference, and it was infeasible for the agency to file the text or other material, provide an explanation of why filing the text or other material was infeasible:

    Not Applicable.

    11.  If revising or refiling this rule, identify changes made from the previously filed version of this rule; if none, please state so. If applicable, indicate each specific paragraph of the rule that has been modified:

    Question 19(B) - There is no penalty associated with this rule that impacts businesses.

    12.  119.032 Rule Review Date:

    (If the rule is not exempt and you answered NO to question No. 1, provide the

    scheduled review date. If you answered YES to No. 1, the review date for this rule is the filing date.)

    NOTE: If the rule is not exempt at the time of final filing, two dates are required: the current review date plus a date not to exceed 5 years from the effective date for Amended rules or a date not to exceed 5 years from the review date for No Change rules.

    FISCAL ANALYSIS

    13.  Estimate the total amount by which this proposed rule would increase / decrease either revenues / expenditures for the agency during the current biennium (in dollars): Explain the net impact of the proposed changes to the budget of your agency/department.

    This will have no impact on revenues or expenditures. 0.00

    n/a

    14.  Identify the appropriation (by line item etc.) that authorizes each expenditure necessitated by the proposed rule:

    n/a

    15.  Provide a summary of the estimated cost of compliance with the rule to all directly affected persons. When appropriate, please include the source for your information/estimated costs, e.g. industry, CFR, internal/agency:

    n/a

    16.  Does this rule have a fiscal effect on school districts, counties, townships, or municipal corporations? No

    17.  Does this rule deal with environmental protection or contain a component dealing with environmental protection as defined in R. C. 121.39? No

    S.B. 2 (129th General Assembly) Questions

    18.  Has this rule been filed with the Common Sense Initiative Office pursuant to R.C. 121.82?

    19.  Specific to this rule, answer the following:

    A.) Does this rule require a license, permit, or any other prior authorization to engage in or operate a line of business? No

    B.) Does this rule impose a criminal penalty, a civil penalty, or another sanction, or create a cause of action, for failure to comply with its terms? No

    C.) Does this rule require specific expenditures or the report of information as a condition of compliance? No